Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05949
Martinez v Hands of Hope P.T., P.C.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05949
Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s claim under the New York City Human Rights Law against the employer, holding that a physical therapist assistant’s sexual assault was outside the scope of employment. The court determined that such conduct, committed for wholly personal motives, does not further the employer’s business and thus precludes vicarious liability.
The court’s words
A sexual assault perpetrated by an employee is not in furtherance of an employer's business and is a clear departure from the scope of employment, having been committed for wholly personal motives
2026 NY Slip Op 05949, at the official text
an employer may be vicariously liable for the tortious acts of its employees only if those acts were committed in furtherance of the employer's business and within the scope of employment
2026 NY Slip Op 05949, at the official text
Where an employee's actions are taken for wholly personal reasons, which are not job related, the challenged conduct cannot be said to fall within the scope of employment
2026 NY Slip Op 05949, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 14, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05949 |
| Area of law | Employment and Discrimination · Civil Rights and Constitutional Law |
| Week | Week ending October 17, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05949 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1186 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Martinez v Hands of Hope P.T., P.C., 2026 NY Slip Op 05949 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05949/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works