ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05960

Matter of Telesford v Hartofilis

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05960

Holding The court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding on the merits because the petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. The court held that the extraordinary remedy of mandamus is limited to compelling the performance of a ministerial act.

The court’s words

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought

2026 NY Slip Op 05960, at the official text

The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought

2026 NY Slip Op 05960, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 14, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05960
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 17, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05960
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1197

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Telesford v Hartofilis, 2026 NY Slip Op 05960 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05960/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 14, 2026. Updated October 14, 2026.