ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05965

Pennymac Corp. v New York City Envtl. Control Bd.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05965

Holding The court affirmed the denial of a nonparty’s motion to intervene and vacate a foreclosure judgment as untimely. The nonparty was deemed to have constructive notice of the action via a filed notice of pendency and failed to justify a 14-year delay in seeking relief.

The court’s words

the filing of a notice of pendency at the time of the commencement of the action provided constructive notice of the action

2026 NY Slip Op 05965, at the official text

194 Grant did not move for leave to intervene in this action until August 2022—approximately 14 years after it allegedly took title to the property

2026 NY Slip Op 05965, at the official text

the motion must be made within a reasonable time

2026 NY Slip Op 05965, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 14, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05965
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 17, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05965
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1202
Related recordsPennymac Corp. v New York City Envtl. Control Bd., 2026 NY Slip Op 05966

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Pennymac Corp. v New York City Envtl. Control Bd., 2026 NY Slip Op 05965 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05965/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 14, 2026. Updated October 14, 2026.