ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05985

Salazar v Carol Joy Family Props., LLC

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05985

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint against the defendant mortgagee because it established that it was an out-of-possession mortgagee that did not own, possess, or control the property. Consequently, the defendant did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff for the dangerous condition on the sidewalk.

The court’s words

liability for a dangerous or defective condition on real property must be predicated upon ownership, occupancy, control, or special use of that property

2026 NY Slip Op 05985, at the official text

the defendant established, prima facie, that it was an out-of-possession mortgagee that did not owe a duty to the plaintiff

2026 NY Slip Op 05985, at the official text

the mere hope or speculation that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process is an insufficient basis for denying the motion

2026 NY Slip Op 05985, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 14, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05985
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending October 17, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05985
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1222

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Salazar v Carol Joy Family Props., LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 05985 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05985/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 14, 2026. Updated October 14, 2026.