Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05985
Salazar v Carol Joy Family Props., LLC
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05985
Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint against the defendant mortgagee because it established that it was an out-of-possession mortgagee that did not own, possess, or control the property. Consequently, the defendant did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff for the dangerous condition on the sidewalk.
The court’s words
liability for a dangerous or defective condition on real property must be predicated upon ownership, occupancy, control, or special use of that property
2026 NY Slip Op 05985, at the official text
the defendant established, prima facie, that it was an out-of-possession mortgagee that did not owe a duty to the plaintiff
2026 NY Slip Op 05985, at the official text
the mere hope or speculation that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process is an insufficient basis for denying the motion
2026 NY Slip Op 05985, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 14, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05985 |
| Area of law | Personal Injury and Negligence |
| Week | Week ending October 17, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05985 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1222 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Salazar v Carol Joy Family Props., LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 05985 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05985/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works