Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Begum

Holding The judgment of foreclosure and sale is affirmed because the plaintiff established standing and compliance with RPAPL 1303 notice requirements. The appellant’s objections to the referee’s report were deemed untimely, and her remaining arguments were either improperly raised for the first time on appeal or without merit.

The court’s words

the plaintiff established, prima facie, that its predecessor in interest had standing to commence this action

2026 NY Slip Op 05996, at the official text

the appellant failed to raise a triable issue of fact

2026 NY Slip Op 05996, at the official text

the appellant, who was not a borrower, was not entitled to notice pursuant to RPAPL 1304

2026 NY Slip Op 05996, at the official text

that branch of the [appellant's] cross-motion which was, in effect, to reject the referee's report was untimely

2026 NY Slip Op 05996, at the official text

the appellant's contention that the document execution associate improperly relied upon unproduced business records is improperly raised for the first time on appeal

2026 NY Slip Op 05996, at the official text