Appellate Division, First Department · October 15, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06013
Matter of McCollum
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06013
Holding The court granted the Attorney Grievance Committee’s motion for interim suspension, finding that the respondent’s sworn admissions of professional misconduct and her persistent failure to comply with lawful demands warranted immediate suspension. The court determined that the respondent’s lack of cooperation and failure to substantiate claimed health issues supported the finding of conduct immediately threatening the public interest.
The court’s words
The AGC has met its burden for interim suspension under 1240.9(a)(2) and (3) and respondent should be immediately suspended.
2026 NY Slip Op 06013, at the official text
Her lack of cooperation continued even after her deposition: she still did not answer the complaints or produce all requested documents despite multiple opportunities to do so
2026 NY Slip Op 06013, at the official text
Although respondent cited health issues, she has not provided any medical records to substantiate them
2026 NY Slip Op 06013, at the official text
her failure to update her registered business address with OCA, as required by Judiciary Law §468-a(2), has impeded the AGC's ability to contact her
2026 NY Slip Op 06013, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 15, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06013 |
| Area of law | Attorney Discipline and Professional Responsibility |
| Week | Week ending October 17, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06013 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1268 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of McCollum, 2026 NY Slip Op 06013 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 15, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06013/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works