ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Third Department · October 15, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06041

People v Hummel-Parker

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06041

Holding The court held that the defendant’s appeal waiver was invalid due to overbroad language that was not cured by the oral colloquy. However, the judgment was affirmed because the plea was voluntary and the enhanced sentence was not unduly harsh or severe.

The court’s words

The written appeal waiver executed by defendant during the plea colloquy contains overbroad language, as it purports to, among other things, preclude him from pursuing collateral relief

2026 NY Slip Op 06041, at the official text

the totality of the circumstances does not establish that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal

2026 NY Slip Op 06041, at the official text

we are unpersuaded that the enhanced sentence, which is within the permissible statutory range for a second felony offender, was unduly harsh or severe

2026 NY Slip Op 06041, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Third Department
DecidedOctober 15, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06041
Area of lawCriminal Law
WeekWeek ending October 17, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06041
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1243

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Hummel-Parker, 2026 NY Slip Op 06041 (Appellate Division, Third Department, October 15, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06041/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 15, 2026. Updated October 15, 2026.