Appellate Division, Third Department · October 15, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06046
Matter of Rendon v Cosan Constr. Corp.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06046
Holding The Workers’ Compensation Board properly refused to consider new documentary evidence submitted on administrative appeal without a sworn affidavit explaining its unavailability at the hearing. The Board’s determination that the claimant’s neck, back, shoulder, ankle, and knee injuries were causally connected to the work-related fall was supported by substantial evidence.
The court’s words
An appealing party who seeks to introduce additional documentary evidence in [an] administrative appeal that was not presented before the [WCLJ] . . . must submit a sworn affidavit, setting forth the evidence, and explaining why it could not have been presented before the [WCLJ]
2026 NY Slip Op 06046, at the official text
The Board is empowered to determine the factual issue of whether a causal relationship exists based upon the record, and its determination will not be disturbed when supported by substantial evidence
2026 NY Slip Op 06046, at the official text
claimant bore the burden of establishing, by competent medical evidence, the existence of a causal connection between his injury and his employment
2026 NY Slip Op 06046, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Third Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 15, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06046 |
| Area of law | Workers’ Compensation and Unemployment |
| Week | Week ending October 17, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06046 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1253 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Rendon v Cosan Constr. Corp., 2026 NY Slip Op 06046 (Appellate Division, Third Department, October 15, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06046/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works