Appellate Division, First Department · October 20, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06072
People v Letang
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06072
Holding The conviction for criminal possession of a controlled substance was affirmed because the evidence was not against the weight of the evidence and the trial court properly admitted the narcotics despite chain of custody gaps. The court also properly precluded evidence of prior sales by another person and denied the motion to reopen the Mapp hearing based on conclusory allegations.
The court’s words
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence
2026 NY Slip Op 06072, at the official text
provided reasonable assurances of the identity and unchanged condition of the narcotics evidence
2026 NY Slip Op 06072, at the official text
logical explanations for the inconsistencies [were] provided, or can reasonably be inferred from the surrounding circumstances
2026 NY Slip Op 06072, at the official text
Evidence of these prior sales by another person has little or no probative value
2026 NY Slip Op 06072, at the official text
Defendant's motion for a Mapp hearing was supported by only conclusory allegations
2026 NY Slip Op 06072, at the official text
the police handcuffed defendant upon entering the apartment to execute a search warrant, which did not constitute an arrest
2026 NY Slip Op 06072, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 20, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06072 |
| Area of law | Criminal Law |
| Week | Week ending October 24, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06072 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1332 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Letang, 2026 NY Slip Op 06072 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 20, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06072/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works