ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · October 20, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06080

United States Fire Insurance Company et al. v Michael Palin et al.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06080

Holding The appeal was dismissed as taken from a nonappealable paper because an order declining to sign an order to show cause is an ex parte order that does not decide a motion made on notice. The court also declined to grant leave to appeal in the interest of justice, finding that the plaintiffs’ expenditure of resources to perfect the appeal did not constitute a unique circumstance warranting such relief.

The court’s words

No appeal lies from an order declining to sign an order to show cause, since it is an ex parte order that does not decide a motion made on notice

2026 NY Slip Op 06080, at the official text

the fact that plaintiffs have expended resources to perfect this appeal is not the type of unique circumstance that warrants such relief

2026 NY Slip Op 06080, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedOctober 20, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06080
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 24, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06080
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1340

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, United States Fire Insurance Company et al. v Michael Palin et al., 2026 NY Slip Op 06080 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 20, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06080/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 20, 2026. Updated October 20, 2026.