Appellate Division, Second Department · October 21, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06084
Bank of America, N.A. v Maddox
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06084
Holding The court reversed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff because the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie standing and strict compliance with RPAPL 1304 notice requirements. Specifically, the plaintiff could not prove it held the note at the time of commencement or that the required 90-day notice was sent by both certified and first-class mail.
The court’s words
Strict compliance with RPAPL 1304 notice to the borrower or borrowers is a condition precedent to the commencement of a foreclosure action
2026 NY Slip Op 06084, at the official text
the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, its strict compliance with RPAPL 1304
2026 NY Slip Op 06084, at the official text
the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, its standing to commence the action
2026 NY Slip Op 06084, at the official text
the Supreme Court should have denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment
2026 NY Slip Op 06084, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 21, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06084 |
| Area of law | Mortgage Foreclosure · Real Property |
| Week | Week ending October 24, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06084 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1347 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Bank of America, N.A. v Maddox, 2026 NY Slip Op 06084 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 21, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06084/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works