ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 21, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06088

Burton v Gurung

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06088

Holding The court affirmed the summary judgment dismissing the complaint against the livery defendants because they established they were not at fault in the accident. The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding the cause of the collision or the prematurity of the motion.

The court’s words

the issue of proximate cause may be decided as a matter of law where only one conclusion may be drawn from the established facts

2026 NY Slip Op 06088, at the official text

the mere hope or speculation that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process is an insufficient basis for denying the motion

2026 NY Slip Op 06088, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 21, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06088
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending October 24, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06088
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1353

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Burton v Gurung, 2026 NY Slip Op 06088 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 21, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06088/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 21, 2026. Updated October 21, 2026.