ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 21, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06104

Indian Harbor Insurance Company v SP & K Construction, Inc.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06104

Holding The insurer failed to demonstrate entitlement to rescind the policy because it did not present documentation showing its underwriting practices would have prohibited issuance had the true facts been disclosed. The court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint but modified the judgment to award the defendants costs and attorneys’ fees.

The court’s words

the plaintiff's witness did not identify any underwriting guideline or policy that would have prohibited the issuance of the insurance policy

2026 NY Slip Op 06104, at the official text

the guideline for an 'owner's interest' policy did not specifically require the insured to enter into hold-harmless agreements

2026 NY Slip Op 06104, at the official text

the amended judgment must contain a provision declaring that the insurance policy is not void

2026 NY Slip Op 06104, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 21, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06104
Area of lawInsurance
WeekWeek ending October 24, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06104
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1369

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Indian Harbor Insurance Company v SP & K Construction, Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 06104 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 21, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06104/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 21, 2026. Updated October 21, 2026.