Appellate Division, Second Department · October 21, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06108
McLean v Nelson
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06108
Holding The Appellate Division reversed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment because the defendants failed to establish that they lacked actual or constructive notice of the hazardous condition. Additionally, the defendants did not demonstrate that the condition was open and obvious or not inherently dangerous as a matter of law.
The court’s words
a defendant property owner moving for summary judgment has the burden of making a prima facie showing that it neither (1) affirmatively created the hazardous condition nor (2) had actual or constructive notice of the condition
2026 NY Slip Op 06108, at the official text
the defendants did not establish, prima facie, that they had no actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition
2026 NY Slip Op 06108, at the official text
they failed to establish, prima facie, or even argue to the Supreme Court, that they had no actual or constructive notice of the tool on the floor
2026 NY Slip Op 06108, at the official text
they also failed to establish, prima facie, that there were no triable issues of fact as to whether the alleged condition was open and obvious
2026 NY Slip Op 06108, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 21, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06108 |
| Area of law | Personal Injury and Negligence |
| Week | Week ending October 24, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06108 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1373 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, McLean v Nelson, 2026 NY Slip Op 06108 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 21, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06108/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works