ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 21, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06111

Montera v Ravitz

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06111

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims regarding treatment prior to August 7, 2016, because the plaintiff failed to oppose the statute of limitations motion. Consequently, the plaintiff failed to raise a question of fact regarding the applicability of the continuous treatment doctrine.

The court’s words

the plaintiff failed to oppose that branch of the defendants' motion which was to dismiss so much of the complaint as was based on treatment provided to the plaintiff prior to August 7, 2016

2026 NY Slip Op 06111, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 21, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06111
Area of lawMedical Malpractice
WeekWeek ending October 24, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06111
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1376

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Montera v Ravitz, 2026 NY Slip Op 06111 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 21, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06111/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 21, 2026. Updated October 21, 2026.