ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 21, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06132

People v Chimborazo

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06132

Holding The judgments were reversed and the matter remitted for a new trial before a different Justice because the trial court conducted excessive and prejudicial questioning of witnesses, creating the impression that it was an advocate for the People. The court reached this unpreserved claim in the exercise of its interest of justice jurisdiction.

The court’s words

the Supreme Court conducted excessive and prejudicial questioning of trial witnesses

2026 NY Slip Op 06132, at the official text

generally created the impression that it was an advocate for the People

2026 NY Slip Op 06132, at the official text

we reach this contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction

2026 NY Slip Op 06132, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 21, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06132
Area of lawCriminal Law
WeekWeek ending October 24, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06132
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1397

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Chimborazo, 2026 NY Slip Op 06132 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 21, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06132/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 21, 2026. Updated October 21, 2026.