ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 21, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06159

Sapp-Gooding v Kreindler & Kreindler, LLP

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06159

Holding The court affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss the legal malpractice claim, finding that the plaintiffs stated a cause of action and raised triable issues of fact regarding the continuous representation doctrine tolling the statute of limitations. Additionally, the court upheld the extension of time to serve the summons with notice in the interest of justice.

The court’s words

the plaintiffs have a cause of action alleging legal malpractice

2026 NY Slip Op 06159, at the official text

the plaintiffs raised questions of fact as to whether there was a mutual understanding of the need for further representation

2026 NY Slip Op 06159, at the official text

the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b

2026 NY Slip Op 06159, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 21, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06159
Area of lawAttorney Discipline and Professional Responsibility
WeekWeek ending October 24, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06159
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1424

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Sapp-Gooding v Kreindler & Kreindler, LLP, 2026 NY Slip Op 06159 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 21, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06159/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 21, 2026. Updated October 21, 2026.