U.S. Bank National Association, etc., respondent, v William L. Vetri, etc., appellant, et al., defendants.

Holding The court affirmed the denial of the defendant’s cross-motion to vacate the foreclosure judgment, finding that the defendant failed to demonstrate that newly discovered evidence would have produced a different result. Additionally, the defendant failed to establish a potentially meritorious defense or any fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by the plaintiff to support relief under CPLR 5015(a)(3).

The court’s words

The defendant failed to demonstrate that the purported newly discovered evidence would probably have produced a different result

2026 NY Slip Op 06162, at the official text

The defendant failed to provide a potentially meritorious defense to the action

2026 NY Slip Op 06162, at the official text

The defendant also failed to establish that the plaintiff engaged in any fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct

2026 NY Slip Op 06162, at the official text