ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Third Department · October 22, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06191

U.S. Bank N.A. v Sukljian

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06191

Holding The court reversed the grant of summary judgment because the plaintiff failed to establish standing as the holder of the note at the time the action was commenced. Specifically, the plaintiff did not provide evidence that the allonges containing the necessary endorsements were firmly affixed to the note when the lawsuit began.

The court’s words

mere physical possession of a note at the commencement of a foreclosure action is insufficient to confer standing

2026 NY Slip Op 06191, at the official text

mere possession of such allonges was insufficient to establish standing without evidence that they were "so firmly affixed" to the note

2026 NY Slip Op 06191, at the official text

plaintiff failed to establish as a matter of law that it had standing to commence the action

2026 NY Slip Op 06191, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Third Department
DecidedOctober 22, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06191
Area of lawMortgage Foreclosure
WeekWeek ending October 24, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06191
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1482

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, U.S. Bank N.A. v Sukljian, 2026 NY Slip Op 06191 (Appellate Division, Third Department, October 22, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06191/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 22, 2026. Updated October 22, 2026.