ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · October 22, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06207

Osei v Polanco-Puello

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06207

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint because the plaintiff failed to establish a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102(d). The plaintiff’s expert failed to provide a causation opinion regarding the MRI findings, which defeated both the permanent limitation and 90/180-day claims.

The court’s words

opined that they depicted only preexisting, degenerative conditions not causally related to the accident

2026 NY Slip Op 06207, at the official text

offered no opinion on causation in either his affirmation or his reports

2026 NY Slip Op 06207, at the official text

no posttraumatic changes causally related to the vehicle collision

2026 NY Slip Op 06207, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedOctober 22, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06207
Area of lawInsurance
WeekWeek ending October 24, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06207
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1465

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Osei v Polanco-Puello, 2026 NY Slip Op 06207 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 22, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06207/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 22, 2026. Updated October 22, 2026.