Court of Appeals · October 27, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06235
People v Salina B.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06235
Holding The Court held that the defendant’s challenge to her plea was unpreserved for appellate review because she did not move to withdraw her plea or vacate the judgment. Consequently, the Appellate Division’s order was reversed and the case remitted for further proceedings.
The court’s words
defendant's recitation of the facts underlying the crime pleaded to clearly casts significant doubt upon the defendant's guilt
2026 NY Slip Op 06235, at the official text
defendant may challenge the sufficiency of [their plea] allocution on direct appeal, notwithstanding that a formal postallocution motion was not made
2026 NY Slip Op 06235, at the official text
defendant's challenge to her plea is unpreserved for appellate review because she did not move to withdraw her plea
2026 NY Slip Op 06235, at the official text
| Court | Court of Appeals |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 27, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06235 |
| Area of law | Criminal Procedure |
| Week | Week ending October 31, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06235 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1511 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Salina B., 2026 NY Slip Op 06235 (Court of Appeals, October 27, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06235/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works