ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Court of Appeals · October 27, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06235

People v Salina B.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06235

Holding The Court held that the defendant’s challenge to her plea was unpreserved for appellate review because she did not move to withdraw her plea or vacate the judgment. Consequently, the Appellate Division’s order was reversed and the case remitted for further proceedings.

The court’s words

defendant's recitation of the facts underlying the crime pleaded to clearly casts significant doubt upon the defendant's guilt

2026 NY Slip Op 06235, at the official text

defendant may challenge the sufficiency of [their plea] allocution on direct appeal, notwithstanding that a formal postallocution motion was not made

2026 NY Slip Op 06235, at the official text

defendant's challenge to her plea is unpreserved for appellate review because she did not move to withdraw her plea

2026 NY Slip Op 06235, at the official text
CourtCourt of Appeals
DecidedOctober 27, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06235
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 31, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06235
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1511

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Salina B., 2026 NY Slip Op 06235 (Court of Appeals, October 27, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06235/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 27, 2026. Updated October 27, 2026.