Appellate Division, First Department · October 27, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06240
Brown v Parkchester Preserv. Mgt.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06240
Holding The court affirmed the denial of summary judgment because the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact regarding whether a storm was in progress at the time of the fall. Additionally, the record presented unresolved questions about whether black ice existed prior to the storm and whether the defendant had constructive notice of the condition.
The court’s words
Plaintiff's deposition testimony was that the freezing rain had stopped before she slipped and fell on black ice
2026 NY Slip Op 06240, at the official text
questions of credibility are left to the trier of fact
2026 NY Slip Op 06240, at the official text
Defendant did not submit evidence establishing when the walkway was last inspected or cleaned
2026 NY Slip Op 06240, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 27, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06240 |
| Area of law | Personal Injury and Negligence |
| Week | Week ending October 31, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06240 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1516 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Brown v Parkchester Preserv. Mgt., 2026 NY Slip Op 06240 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 27, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06240/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works