ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · October 27, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06240

Brown v Parkchester Preserv. Mgt.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06240

Holding The court affirmed the denial of summary judgment because the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact regarding whether a storm was in progress at the time of the fall. Additionally, the record presented unresolved questions about whether black ice existed prior to the storm and whether the defendant had constructive notice of the condition.

The court’s words

Plaintiff's deposition testimony was that the freezing rain had stopped before she slipped and fell on black ice

2026 NY Slip Op 06240, at the official text

questions of credibility are left to the trier of fact

2026 NY Slip Op 06240, at the official text

Defendant did not submit evidence establishing when the walkway was last inspected or cleaned

2026 NY Slip Op 06240, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedOctober 27, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06240
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending October 31, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06240
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1516

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Brown v Parkchester Preserv. Mgt., 2026 NY Slip Op 06240 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 27, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06240/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 27, 2026. Updated October 27, 2026.