ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · October 27, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06246

Matter of Hellman Elec. LLC v City of New York

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06246

Holding The DOT’s renewal of the contract without a specific fair-and-reasonable price determination was not arbitrary and capricious because the regulation only requires such a determination if applicable. The court found the DOT’s interpretation that the requirement applies only when there was no initial competitive bidding process to be rational.

The court’s words

renewal process differs from competitive bidding in that a fair-and-reasonable determination is not categorically required

2026 NY Slip Op 06246, at the official text

determining whether the contract price is still fair and reasonable protects the public fisc from renewals upon inflated pricing

2026 NY Slip Op 06246, at the official text

laws and regulations governing procurement were not enacted to help enrich the corporate bidders but, rather were intended for the benefit of the taxpayers

2026 NY Slip Op 06246, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedOctober 27, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06246
Area of lawAdministrative Law
WeekWeek ending October 31, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06246
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1521

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Hellman Elec. LLC v City of New York, 2026 NY Slip Op 06246 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 27, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06246/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 27, 2026. Updated October 27, 2026.