ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · October 27, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06257

People v Bonilla

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06257

Holding The appellate court dismissed the appeal because the defendant’s challenges to a voluntary forfeiture agreement were not properly before the court, as the forfeiture was not part of the judgment of conviction. The court noted that the forfeiture was based on a voluntary settlement of a potential civil proceeding governed by the CPLR, rather than a criminal sentence.

The court’s words

the forfeiture was not part of the judgment of conviction

2026 NY Slip Op 06257, at the official text

the forfeiture was based on a voluntary settlement of a potential, separate civil proceeding

2026 NY Slip Op 06257, at the official text

no other issues are raised with respect to the judgment of conviction

2026 NY Slip Op 06257, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedOctober 27, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06257
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 31, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06257
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1532

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Bonilla, 2026 NY Slip Op 06257 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 27, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06257/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 27, 2026. Updated October 27, 2026.