ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 28, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06272

217-20 K&A, LLC v De Maio Props., LLC

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06272

Holding The plaintiff was not eligible for a preliminary injunction because it sought injunctive relief after the expiration of the cure period. Additionally, the plaintiff failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits because obtaining prospective insurance could not retrospectively cure the default arising from the failure to continually maintain insurance coverage.

The court’s words

the plaintiff was not eligible for a preliminary injunction pursuant to CPLR 6301 because the plaintiff did not seek injunctive relief until after the expiration of the cure period

2026 NY Slip Op 06272, at the official text

the fact that the plaintiff obtained prospective insurance could not retrospectively cure the default arising from the plaintiff's failure to have continually maintained insurance coverage

2026 NY Slip Op 06272, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 28, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06272
Area of lawReal Property
WeekWeek ending October 31, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06272
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1546

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, 217-20 K&A, LLC v De Maio Props., LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 06272 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 28, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06272/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 28, 2026. Updated October 28, 2026.