ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 28, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06281

DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc. v Rubel

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06281

Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion for leave to renew its opposition to a dismissal. The court determined that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a change in the law, which is required for such a motion.

The court’s words

A motion for leave to renew is the appropriate vehicle for seeking relief from a prior order based on a change in the law

2026 NY Slip Op 06281, at the official text

Here, however, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a change in the law

2026 NY Slip Op 06281, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 28, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06281
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 31, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06281
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1560

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc. v Rubel, 2026 NY Slip Op 06281 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 28, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06281/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 28, 2026. Updated October 28, 2026.