Appellate Division, Second Department · October 28, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06292
Magpantay v New York City Sch. Constr. Auth.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06292
Holding The court granted summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240(1) claim, finding that the failure to secure a falling object was a proximate cause of the injury. However, it affirmed the denial of summary judgment on the Labor Law § 241(6) and § 200 claims due to triable issues of fact regarding the area’s exposure to falling objects and the defendants’ supervisory control.
The court’s words
Labor Law § 240(1) imposes a nondelegable duty and absolute liability upon owners and general contractors
2026 NY Slip Op 06292, at the official text
the plaintiffs established, prima facie, the existence of a hazard contemplated under Labor Law § 240(1)
2026 NY Slip Op 06292, at the official text
the injured plaintiff's testimony that certain objects had fallen in the same area in which the injured plaintiff was injured approximately one hour before the accident was inadequate
2026 NY Slip Op 06292, at the official text
the plaintiffs' submissions failed to establish, prima facie, that the defendants exercised sufficient supervisory control over the injured plaintiff's work
2026 NY Slip Op 06292, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 28, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06292 |
| Area of law | Labor Law and Construction Accidents |
| Week | Week ending October 31, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06292 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1571 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Magpantay v New York City Sch. Constr. Auth., 2026 NY Slip Op 06292 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 28, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06292/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works