ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 28, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06346

Velasquez v 88 Cypress, LLC

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06346

Holding The Appellate Division reversed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment because the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the alleged sidewalk defect was trivial or that it lacked constructive notice. The court found the defendant’s expert affidavit insufficient because the inspection occurred more than three years after the accident without proof the condition remained unchanged.

The court’s words

The defendant's expert's affidavit was insufficient to establish that no actionable defect existed at the time of the accident

2026 NY Slip Op 06346, at the official text

the expert's opinions were based upon an inspection that occurred more than three years after the accident

2026 NY Slip Op 06346, at the official text

there was no showing that the area measured and examined by the expert was in the same condition as it was on the date of the accident

2026 NY Slip Op 06346, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 28, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06346
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending October 31, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06346
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1625

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Velasquez v 88 Cypress, LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 06346 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 28, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06346/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 28, 2026. Updated October 28, 2026.