Appellate Division, Third Department · October 29, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06369
Matter of McDonell v CJ Banach Inc.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06369
Holding The Board lacked discretion to excuse the carrier’s failure to serve the pre-hearing conference statement because the governing rule mandates waiver of defenses absent a showing of good cause and good faith. The carrier’s defenses were properly waived because it failed to provide the required affidavit demonstrating that the error was due to good cause and that it exercised due diligence.
The court’s words
failure by the insurance carrier to timely serve upon all other parties . . . the pre-hearing conference statement . . . shall result in a waiver of defenses to the claim
2026 NY Slip Op 06369, at the official text
The mandatory nature of th[e pertinent rule's] language contrasts with the language used in the Board's other rules
2026 NY Slip Op 06369, at the official text
The absence of prejudice to claimant also will not excuse the carrier's failure to serve claimant's counsel
2026 NY Slip Op 06369, at the official text
no such affidavit was provided
2026 NY Slip Op 06369, at the official text
we see no reason to disturb the Board's finding that the carrier's defenses were waived
2026 NY Slip Op 06369, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Third Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 29, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06369 |
| Area of law | Workers’ Compensation and Unemployment |
| Week | Week ending October 31, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06369 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1669 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of McDonell v CJ Banach Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 06369 (Appellate Division, Third Department, October 29, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06369/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works