Appellate Division, First Department · October 29, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06385
Matter of Wolk
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06385
Holding The court granted the Attorney Grievance Committee’s motion for interim suspension, finding that uncontroverted evidence of the attorney’s misappropriation of client funds and misrepresentations to the court constituted conduct immediately threatening the public interest. The attorney’s claimed good faith belief in his right to the funds did not controvert the bank records showing the funds were removed from the IOLA account while the dispute remained unresolved.
The court’s words
the AGC has met its burden under section 1240.9(a)(5) by presenting sufficient evidence of uncontroverted professional misconduct
2026 NY Slip Op 06385, at the official text
his asserted belief that the orders were legally erroneous does not controvert the bank records showing that the entrusted funds were removed from the IOLA account while the dispute remained unresolved
2026 NY Slip Op 06385, at the official text
uncontroverted evidence of misappropriation of client or third-party funds, particularly when coupled with misrepresentations concerning those funds, as conduct warranting an interim suspension
2026 NY Slip Op 06385, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 29, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06385 |
| Area of law | Attorney Discipline and Professional Responsibility |
| Week | Week ending October 31, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06385 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1644 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Wolk, 2026 NY Slip Op 06385 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 29, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06385/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works