ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · October 29, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06394

Ramos v Lendlease (US) Constr. LMB Inc.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06394

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The court affirmed summary judgment on the Labor Law § 241(6) claim but reversed the summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240(1) claim. The reversal was based on the defendant’s ability to raise an issue of fact regarding whether the staircase was a permanent appurtenance and the sole means of access to the work area.

The court’s words

Plaintiff failed to establish that the staircase was the sole means of access because he testified that he could have gone up one flight of stairs and then taken the hoist down

2026 NY Slip Op 06394, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedOctober 29, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06394
Area of lawLabor Law and Construction Accidents
WeekWeek ending October 31, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06394
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1662

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Ramos v Lendlease (US) Constr. LMB Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 06394 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 29, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06394/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 29, 2026. Updated October 29, 2026.