ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · November 4, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06418

Estate of Tadeusz W. Czajkowski, et al., v. City of New York, et al.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06418

Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew their opposition to the dismissal of the complaint. The court determined that the plaintiffs failed to present any new facts or evidence that would have altered the prior determination regarding the dismissal.

The court’s words

The plaintiffs failed to offer any new facts or evidence that would have changed the prior determination with respect to the defendants' motion

2026 NY Slip Op 06418, at the official text

Compliance with a demand for a General Municipal Law § 50-h examination is a condition precedent to the commencement of an action against a municipal defendant

2026 NY Slip Op 06418, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedNovember 4, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06418
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence · Civil Procedure · Municipal Law and Government Liability
WeekWeek ending November 7, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06418
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1713

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Estate of Tadeusz W. Czajkowski, et al., v. City of New York, et al., 2026 NY Slip Op 06418 (Appellate Division, Second Department, November 4, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06418/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published November 4, 2026. Updated November 4, 2026.