Appellate Division, Second Department · November 4, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06437
Matter of DePasquale v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06437
Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s judgment annulling the Board of Trustees’ denial of World Trade Center disability retirement benefits. The court found that the Medical Board’s determination was arbitrary and capricious because it lacked a rational basis and failed to rebut the statutory presumption of causation.
The court’s words
the determination of the Medical Board that the petitioner was not disabled from performing his job duties was not supported by credible evidence and was arbitrary and capricious
2026 NY Slip Op 06437, at the official text
his opinion was inconsistent with the evidence in the record and lacked a rational basis for disregarding findings from providers who concluded, inter alia, that the petitioner presented with PTSD symptoms that prevented him from performing his duties
2026 NY Slip Op 06437, at the official text
the Medical Board failed to present credible evidence to rebut the statutory presumption that the petitioner's disability was caused by his activities at the World Trade Center site
2026 NY Slip Op 06437, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | November 4, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06437 |
| Area of law | Administrative Law · Employment and Discrimination |
| Week | Week ending November 7, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06437 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1732 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of DePasquale v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 2026 NY Slip Op 06437 (Appellate Division, Second Department, November 4, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06437/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works