ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Third Department · November 5, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06495

Matter of Center for Jud. Accountability, Inc. v New York State Commn. on Legislative, Jud. & Exec. Compensation

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06495

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal of the petition and complaint because the challenge to the proposed judicial salary increases was unripe, as the appropriations had not yet been passed by the Legislature. Additionally, the court found that the Rule of Necessity properly allowed the Supreme Court to retain jurisdiction despite the shared pecuniary interest of judges in the litigation.

The court’s words

the appropriations that underlie Sassower's challenge had not been voted on, let alone passed, by the Legislature at the time of commencement

2026 NY Slip Op 06495, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Third Department
DecidedNovember 5, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06495
Area of lawAdministrative Law
WeekWeek ending November 7, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06495
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1799

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Center for Jud. Accountability, Inc. v New York State Commn. on Legislative, Jud. & Exec. Compensation, 2026 NY Slip Op 06495 (Appellate Division, Third Department, November 5, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06495/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published November 5, 2026. Updated November 5, 2026.