ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Third Department · November 5, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06501

Matter of Waldin v City of Cohoes

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06501

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the petition, holding that the city code’s requirement for the highest negotiated annual percentage increase did not apply to a one-time salary chart restructuring. Consequently, the petitioners were only entitled to the 4% annual increase granted to the animal control officer, not the 7.01% increase resulting from the restructuring.

The court’s words

The plain meaning of that language requires that petitioners' raises match the highest negotiated "annual" percentage increase in salary

2026 NY Slip Op 06501, at the official text

No police officer received such an increase in 2025; rather, the base wages of the officers were altered in varying degrees due to a one-time restructuring of the salary chart

2026 NY Slip Op 06501, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Third Department
DecidedNovember 5, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06501
Area of lawAdministrative Law · Employment and Discrimination
WeekWeek ending November 7, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06501
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1810

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Waldin v City of Cohoes, 2026 NY Slip Op 06501 (Appellate Division, Third Department, November 5, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06501/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published November 5, 2026. Updated November 5, 2026.