ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · November 10, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06550

Deshmukh v Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06550

Holding The appellate court affirmed the order compelling arbitration, determining that a subsequent amended and restated partnership agreement containing an arbitration clause superseded a prior agreement that lacked such a clause. The court held that the subsequent agreement’s explicit language terminating and superseding prior agreements applied to disputes predating the new agreement, even where the employment relationship involved distinct periods.

The court’s words

When parties clearly express their intention that a subsequent agreement supersedes a prior one, the latter agreement controls

2026 NY Slip Op 06550, at the official text

sets forth the entire agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof

2026 NY Slip Op 06550, at the official text

All prior and contemporaneous agreements with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement are hereby terminated and superseded by this Agreement

2026 NY Slip Op 06550, at the official text

We reject any meaningful distinction between Hyuncheol Hwang and Konstantynovska, where the employment relationships were continuous, and the situation here

2026 NY Slip Op 06550, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedNovember 10, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06550
Area of lawContracts and Commercial · Arbitration
WeekWeek ending November 14, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06550
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1847

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Deshmukh v Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, 2026 NY Slip Op 06550 (Appellate Division, First Department, November 10, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06550/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published November 10, 2026. Updated November 10, 2026.