Appellate Division, First Department · November 10, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06550
Deshmukh v Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06550
Holding The appellate court affirmed the order compelling arbitration, determining that a subsequent amended and restated partnership agreement containing an arbitration clause superseded a prior agreement that lacked such a clause. The court held that the subsequent agreement’s explicit language terminating and superseding prior agreements applied to disputes predating the new agreement, even where the employment relationship involved distinct periods.
The court’s words
When parties clearly express their intention that a subsequent agreement supersedes a prior one, the latter agreement controls
2026 NY Slip Op 06550, at the official text
sets forth the entire agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof
2026 NY Slip Op 06550, at the official text
All prior and contemporaneous agreements with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement are hereby terminated and superseded by this Agreement
2026 NY Slip Op 06550, at the official text
We reject any meaningful distinction between Hyuncheol Hwang and Konstantynovska, where the employment relationships were continuous, and the situation here
2026 NY Slip Op 06550, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | November 10, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06550 |
| Area of law | Contracts and Commercial · Arbitration |
| Week | Week ending November 14, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06550 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1847 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Deshmukh v Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, 2026 NY Slip Op 06550 (Appellate Division, First Department, November 10, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06550/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works