Appellate Division, First Department · November 10, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06567
Ukekweh v City of New York
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06567
Holding The complaint against defendant Tabaroki was properly dismissed because the plaintiff failed to plead actual malice, a required element for a malicious prosecution claim. Additionally, the plaintiff’s Section 1983 claim was unpreserved and lacked evidence that the defendant acted under color of law.
The court’s words
plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for malicious prosecution as against him
2026 NY Slip Op 06567, at the official text
The complaint failed to plead actual malice, a required element in a claim of malicious prosecution
2026 NY Slip Op 06567, at the official text
Plaintiff has not shown malice by defendant, as he proffers no evidence suggesting that Tabaroki commenced a criminal proceeding for a wrong or improper motive
2026 NY Slip Op 06567, at the official text
Even if Tabaroki sought police assistance and gave the police information, that is insufficient on its own to establish liability for malicious prosecution
2026 NY Slip Op 06567, at the official text
the record contains no evidence that Tabaroki acted under color of law as a part of a conspiracy with the police to deprive plaintiff of his rights
2026 NY Slip Op 06567, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | November 10, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06567 |
| Area of law | Personal Injury and Negligence |
| Week | Week ending November 14, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06567 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1863 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Ukekweh v City of New York, 2026 NY Slip Op 06567 (Appellate Division, First Department, November 10, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06567/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works