ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · November 12, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06577

People v Jimenez

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06577

Holding The court held that the detective lacked a good faith basis to believe the driver had authority to consent to the search of a bag she explicitly denied owning. Consequently, the search was unlawful, and the resulting evidence, including narcotics and items from a subsequent warrant, was suppressed.

The court’s words

Decker lacked a "good faith" reason to believe that Nunez, the driver of the Jeep had authority to consent to a search of the bag

2026 NY Slip Op 06577, at the official text

Nunez repeatedly and explicitly denied that the bag belonged to her, denied knowing the contents of the bag, and stated that the bag had "nothing to do with" her

2026 NY Slip Op 06577, at the official text

Decker could not have been said to have had a good faith basis to conclude that Nunez was capable of giving consent to search the bag

2026 NY Slip Op 06577, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedNovember 12, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06577
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending November 14, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06577
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1883
Related recordsPeople v Jimenez, 2026 NY Slip Op 06536

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Jimenez, 2026 NY Slip Op 06577 (Appellate Division, First Department, November 12, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06577/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published November 12, 2026. Updated November 12, 2026.