Appellate Division, First Department · November 12, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06577
People v Jimenez
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06577
Holding The court held that the detective lacked a good faith basis to believe the driver had authority to consent to the search of a bag she explicitly denied owning. Consequently, the search was unlawful, and the resulting evidence, including narcotics and items from a subsequent warrant, was suppressed.
The court’s words
Decker lacked a "good faith" reason to believe that Nunez, the driver of the Jeep had authority to consent to a search of the bag
2026 NY Slip Op 06577, at the official text
Nunez repeatedly and explicitly denied that the bag belonged to her, denied knowing the contents of the bag, and stated that the bag had "nothing to do with" her
2026 NY Slip Op 06577, at the official text
Decker could not have been said to have had a good faith basis to conclude that Nunez was capable of giving consent to search the bag
2026 NY Slip Op 06577, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | November 12, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06577 |
| Area of law | Criminal Procedure |
| Week | Week ending November 14, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06577 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1883 |
| Related records | People v Jimenez, 2026 NY Slip Op 06536 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Jimenez, 2026 NY Slip Op 06577 (Appellate Division, First Department, November 12, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06577/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works