ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Third Department · November 12, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06591

People v Titus

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06591

Holding The court affirmed the judgment, holding that the defendant’s challenges to the order of protection were unpreserved for appellate review because he failed to raise them at sentencing. Additionally, the court declined to exercise its interest of justice jurisdiction because the order of protection was an agreed-upon term of the plea agreement.

The court’s words

Such assertions, however, are unpreserved for our review as he failed to raise these challenges at sentencing

2026 NY Slip Op 06591, at the official text

we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction

2026 NY Slip Op 06591, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Third Department
DecidedNovember 12, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06591
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending November 14, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06591
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1874

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Titus, 2026 NY Slip Op 06591 (Appellate Division, Third Department, November 12, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06591/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published November 12, 2026. Updated November 12, 2026.