Appellate Division, Third Department · November 12, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06601
Matter of Hahnenfeld v Good Samaritan Hosp.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06601
Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Board’s denial of the claimant’s request to amend her claim to include Long COVID, finding substantial evidence supported the determination that she failed to prove a causal connection between her April 2020 work-related infection and her later symptoms. The court noted that the claimant’s second, non-work-related infection and preexisting conditions complicated the medical evidence regarding causality.
The court’s words
substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that there was insufficient evidence that claimant's Long COVID was causally related to her April 2020 work-related COVID-19 infection
2026 NY Slip Op 06601, at the official text
the Board is empowered to determine the factual issue of whether a causal relationship exists based upon the record, and its determination will not be disturbed when supported by substantial evidence
2026 NY Slip Op 06601, at the official text
claimant bears the burden of establishing, by competent medical evidence, a causal connection or relationship between her employment and the claimed disability
2026 NY Slip Op 06601, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Third Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | November 12, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06601 |
| Area of law | Workers’ Compensation and Unemployment |
| Week | Week ending November 14, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06601 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1894 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Hahnenfeld v Good Samaritan Hosp., 2026 NY Slip Op 06601 (Appellate Division, Third Department, November 12, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06601/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works