ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Third Department · November 12, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06605

People ex rel. Best v Superintendent of Clinton Corr. Facility

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06605

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding Habeas corpus is not the appropriate remedy for raising claims that could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion, even if they are jurisdictional in nature. The court affirmed the denial of the application because the petitioner’s challenges regarding the grand jury proceeding could have been raised through those alternative procedural avenues.

The court’s words

Habeas corpus is not the appropriate remedy for raising claims that could have been raised on direct appeal or in the context of a CPL article 440 motion, even if they are jurisdictional in nature

2026 NY Slip Op 06605, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Third Department
DecidedNovember 12, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06605
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending November 14, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06605
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1902

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People ex rel. Best v Superintendent of Clinton Corr. Facility, 2026 NY Slip Op 06605 (Appellate Division, Third Department, November 12, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06605/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published November 12, 2026. Updated November 12, 2026.