ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Term, Second Department · June 17, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 51306[U]

New Image Chiropractic, P.C. v Kemper Ins. Co.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51306[U]

Holding The Appellate Term held that a default declaratory judgment against a different insurer had no res judicata or collateral estoppel effect because the plaintiff did not appear in that prior action. Additionally, the court denied the plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment because it failed to submit evidence of the insurer’s address to prove timely mailing of claim forms.

The court’s words

Unitrin's default declaratory judgment against New Image Chiropractic, P.C. has no res judicata effect on this case

2026 NY Slip Op 51306[U], at the official text

New Image Chiropractic, P.C. did not appear in the declaratory judgment action, it did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate

2026 NY Slip Op 51306[U], at the official text

plaintiff did not submit any evidence of an address for Kemper, and thus failed to establish that the prescribed statutory claim form had been received

2026 NY Slip Op 51306[U], at the official text
CourtAppellate Term, Second Department
DecidedJune 17, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 51306[U]
Area of lawInsurance
WeekWeek ending June 20, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51306[U]
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id298

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, New Image Chiropractic, P.C. v Kemper Ins. Co., 2026 NY Slip Op 51306[U] (Appellate Term, Second Department, June 17, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-51306-u/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published June 17, 2026. Updated June 17, 2026.