Appellate Term, First Department · September 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 51530[U]
Burns-Tetteh v Goldfarb Props.-Pelican Mgt., Inc.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51530[U]
This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.
Holding The appeal was dismissed because the plaintiff was not aggrieved by the order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The court indicated that the plaintiff’s proper remedy was to move to vacate the stipulation of discontinuance.
The court’s words
Appeal from order (Joaquin E. Orellana, J.), dated December 9, 2025, dismissed, without costs, as plaintiff-appellant was not aggrieved by the order.
2026 NY Slip Op 51530[U], at the official text
Plaintiff's proper remedy in this particular case lies in a motion to vacate the December 2025 stipulation of discontinuance.
2026 NY Slip Op 51530[U], at the official text
| Court | Appellate Term, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 51530[U] |
| Area of law | Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending September 26, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51530[U] |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 265 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Burns-Tetteh v Goldfarb Props.-Pelican Mgt., Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 51530[U] (Appellate Term, First Department, September 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-51530-u/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works