ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Term, First Department · September 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 51532[U]

Springer v Aminov Jewelers

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51532[U]

Holding The Appellate Term affirmed the Small Claims judgment awarding the plaintiff $8,000, finding that the evidence supported the conclusion that the defendant sold the plaintiff a stolen Rolex watch. The court applied the standard that substantial justice was done, as the seized watch was rationally determined to be the same one sold by the defendant.

The court’s words

substantial justice has not been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law

2026 NY Slip Op 51532[U], at the official text

the Rolex seized by the NYPD was the same watch sold by defendant [to plaintiff]

2026 NY Slip Op 51532[U], at the official text
CourtAppellate Term, First Department
DecidedSeptember 24, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 51532[U]
Area of lawLandlord and Tenant and Housing
WeekWeek ending September 26, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51532[U]
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id275

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Springer v Aminov Jewelers, 2026 NY Slip Op 51532[U] (Appellate Term, First Department, September 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-51532-u/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 24, 2026. Updated September 24, 2026.