ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Term, First Department · September 28, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 51565[U]

Hayes v Muddy Paws Rescue

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51565[U]

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s replevin claim because a prior written agreement transferred ownership of the dog to Animal Care Centers of NYC, leaving the plaintiff without an ownership interest. Additionally, the cross-motion for sanctions was properly denied because the defendants’ conduct was not frivolous.

The court’s words

plaintiff no longer had any ownership interest in the dog upon which to base her replevin claim

2026 NY Slip Op 51565[U], at the official text

conduct complained of was not frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130.1—1

2026 NY Slip Op 51565[U], at the official text
CourtAppellate Term, First Department
DecidedSeptember 28, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 51565[U]
Area of lawContracts and Commercial
WeekWeek ending October 3, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51565[U]
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id815

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Hayes v Muddy Paws Rescue, 2026 NY Slip Op 51565[U] (Appellate Term, First Department, September 28, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-51565-u/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 28, 2026. Updated September 28, 2026.