Appellate Term, First Department · October 1, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 51568[U]
Park-Lex Associates, Petitioner-Landlord-Cross-Appellant, v Fern M. Schad, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant, and Katherine Schad and Mark Mann, Respondents-Undertenants-Appellants.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51568[U]
Holding Summary judgment of possession was unwarranted because triable issues of fact existed regarding the family member succession defense, specifically concerning the permanent vacatur date and residency requirements. The court held that the current Rent Stabilization Code provision defining permanent vacatur is remedial and must be liberally construed to apply to the pending proceeding.
The court’s words
Summary judgment is unwarranted on this record because triable issues of fact exist as to the family member succession defense
2026 NY Slip Op 51568[U], at the official text
The Mitchel-Lama succession rules cited by Civil Court are not applicable herein
2026 NY Slip Op 51568[U], at the official text
Given our disposition, petitioner's request for fair market use and occupancy is denied as academic
2026 NY Slip Op 51568[U], at the official text
| Court | Appellate Term, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 1, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 51568[U] |
| Area of law | Landlord and Tenant and Housing |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51568[U] |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 825 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Park-Lex Associates, Petitioner-Landlord-Cross-Appellant, v Fern M. Schad, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant, and Katherine Schad and Mark Mann, Respondents-Undertenants-Appellants., 2026 NY Slip Op 51568[U] (Appellate Term, First Department, October 1, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-51568-u/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works