ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Term, Second Department · September 18, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 51590[U]

Discover Bank v Lewis

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51590[U]

Holding The court reversed the lower court’s order and granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The defendant successfully rebutted the presumption of service by proving he did not reside at the address where process was served.

The court’s words

defendant submitted unrebutted documentary proof that, in 2016, he moved from the Queens address where service was purportedly effectuated

2026 NY Slip Op 51590[U], at the official text

Consequently, defendant was not served at his dwelling place or usual place of abode

2026 NY Slip Op 51590[U], at the official text

As defendant demonstrated that jurisdiction was never obtained over him, the Civil Court should have granted the branch of his motion

2026 NY Slip Op 51590[U], at the official text
CourtAppellate Term, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 18, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 51590[U]
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending September 19, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51590[U]
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id922

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Discover Bank v Lewis, 2026 NY Slip Op 51590[U] (Appellate Term, Second Department, September 18, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-51590-u/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 18, 2026. Updated September 18, 2026.