ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Term, Second Department · September 18, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 51592[U]

Tibta v 156 E. 21, LLC

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51592[U]

Holding The Appellate Term reversed the lower court’s order holding the landlord in civil contempt because the petitioner failed to establish that the landlord violated a clear and unequivocal mandate of the court. The court found that the original judgment did not explicitly obligate the landlord to facilitate the removal of the new tenant, nor did the landlord create impediments to the execution of the warrant of eviction.

The court’s words

petitioner failed to establish that 156 E. 21, LLC violated a clear mandate contained in the October 30, 2024 decision

2026 NY Slip Op 51592[U], at the official text

such an obligation does not appear in the text of the decision

2026 NY Slip Op 51592[U], at the official text

the Civil Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the branch of petitioner's cross-motion seeking to hold 156 E. 21, LLC in civil contempt

2026 NY Slip Op 51592[U], at the official text
CourtAppellate Term, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 18, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 51592[U]
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending September 19, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51592[U]
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id924

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Tibta v 156 E. 21, LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 51592[U] (Appellate Term, Second Department, September 18, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-51592-u/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 18, 2026. Updated September 18, 2026.