ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Term, Second Department · September 25, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 51599[U]

People v Strickland

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51599[U]

Holding The Appellate Term reversed the lower court’s order striking the certificate of compliance and dismissing the accusatory instrument because the lower court failed to determine whether the defendant satisfied the statutory requirement to challenge the certificate as soon as practicable. The matter was remitted for a hearing to resolve this threshold issue regarding the timeliness of the defendant’s motion.

The court’s words

the order must be reversed and the matter remitted to the Criminal Court for a hearing to determine that threshold issue

2026 NY Slip Op 51599[U], at the official text

defendant had to thereafter notify the People of any potential COC deficiency and challenge any COC by motion as soon as practicable

2026 NY Slip Op 51599[U], at the official text

the absence of such significant items of disclosure was readily noticed by the defense

2026 NY Slip Op 51599[U], at the official text
CourtAppellate Term, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 25, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 51599[U]
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending September 26, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51599[U]
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id931

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Strickland, 2026 NY Slip Op 51599[U] (Appellate Term, Second Department, September 25, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-51599-u/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 25, 2026. Updated September 25, 2026.