Supreme Court, New York County · September 29, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 51633[U]
ACM MCC VI LLC v Able Liquidation Three
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51633[U]
Holding The court ordered defendants to fully respond to post-judgment information subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum by October 30, 2026, rejecting the argument that a Notice of Judgment Debtor was required. The court also scheduled a future conference to address the non-compliance of nonparties, noting that proof of actual receipt is necessary for contempt proceedings against them.
The court’s words
Refusing or neglecting to answer an information subpoena is punishable as a civil contempt
2026 NY Slip Op 51633[U], at the official text
no authority has been presented to this court that holds that a plaintiff is obligated to provide a defendant with information regarding its efforts to enforce a judgment
2026 NY Slip Op 51633[U], at the official text
Proof of the actual receipt of the subpoena is necessary, not only for compliance, but as a predicate for contempt
2026 NY Slip Op 51633[U], at the official text
| Court | Supreme Court, New York County |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 29, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 51633[U] |
| Area of law | Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 51633[U] |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1057 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, ACM MCC VI LLC v Able Liquidation Three, 2026 NY Slip Op 51633[U] (Supreme Court, New York County, September 29, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-51633-u/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works